ReviewMedComm2026
Clinical Application of Peripheral Blood Biomarkers for Solid Tumors.
Review in MedComm, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Psychological distress as a putative host-state determinant of cancer immunotherapy response.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Multi-omics profiling identifies an immunometabolic signature associated with endometriosis.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Peripheral blood biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy: distinguishing predictive from prognostic biomarkers.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing emphasis on precision medicine in the management of solid tumors has underscored the limitations of traditional diagnostic approaches, which often lack sufficient sensitivity or rely on invasive procedures. In contrast, peripheral blood biomarkers provide a minimally invasive, dynamic, and potentially more accurate means for cancer detection and monitoring. The enhancement of detection technology has enabled the incorporation of an increasing number of biomarkers into exploratory clinical trials, which, in turn, have demonstrated immense clinical utility. However, numerous hurdles remain before these biomarkers can be applied in a real clinical setting. This review comprehensively summarizes the clinical utility of key blood-based biomarkers, including circulating tumor cells, circulating tumor DNA, extracellular vesicles, cell-free RNA, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and proteins. We discuss their biological characteristics, detection methodologies, and recent advances in their clinical applications. Moreover, we highlight the emerging role of new technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) in decoding complex data and facilitating clinical decision-making. It is expected to establish the overarching concept of the blood biomarker panel and to understand its comparative advantages, which are essential to realize its potential in precision oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.