ReviewSpartan medical research journal2025
Improving the Diagnostic Workup of Vertigo: A Multidisciplinary Review.
Review in Spartan medical research journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Review of Nystagmus and Vertigo Diagnostics: From Pathological Foundations to AI-Driven Telemedicine.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing Clinical Insight, Medical Education, and Global Health: A Synthesis of Evidence-Based Research and Interdisciplinary Innovation.Spartan medical research journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This Clinical (Narrative) Review addresses potential improvements to the diagnostic workup of vertigo. Despite substantial healthcare expenditures, diagnostic accuracy for vertigo remains suboptimal, and many patients undergo extensive testing without timely identification of the underlying cause. The available literature, with a focus on articles published after 2015, was narratively reviewed for novel risk stratification metrics, clinical pathways, questionnaires, and technological tools that have been developed and studied for improving the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy of vertigo. Recent developments in the workup of vertigo are diverse and show potential for accurately stratifying patients by peripheral versus central etiology. As with any new clinical tools, there are barriers when it comes to implementing them into an emergency or primary care setting. AI/ML-based models are promising; however, further study is needed. These tools may support improved efficiency of the evaluation and management of patients who present with vertigo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.