ArticleProstate cancer2026
Real-World Treatment Patterns Before and After Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer in Japan: Retrospective Analysis Using a Hospital-Based, Multicenter Database.
Article in Prostate cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although treatment options for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have been increasing since 2014, the actual treatment sequences of each drug in clinical practice in Japan have only been reported in a limited number of patients and facilities. The primary objective of this database study was to investigate the general situation and the transition of prior and post-mCRPC treatments. Methods: Using Medical Data Vision's medical record database across Japan, patients diagnosed with mCRPC from January 2015 to December 2022 based on defined criteria were extracted. Treatment sequences before and after mCRPC diagnosis were analyzed. Results: Analysis of 4967 patients revealed that the most common pretreatment for mCRPC was classical vintage hormone therapy (77.1%), followed by androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI), including enzalutamide (7.8%) and abiraterone (7.4%). The most common treatments for first-line mCRPC were enzalutamide (43.1%), abiraterone (28.3%), and docetaxel (10.7%). When the treatment prior to mCRPC was ARSI, docetaxel was the most common first-line treatment for mCRPC, but another ARSI that had not been used as treatment prior to mCRPC was also selected as first-line mCRPC treatment at a similar rate to docetaxel. Regarding annual changes, the proportion of vintage hormone therapy for mCRPC has been decreasing annually, and there has been a trend to replace it with ARSIs. Conclusion: In terms of the treatment sequence for mCRPC in Japan, vintage hormone therapy was the most common pretreatment for mCRPC, and ARSIs were the most common first-line treatments for mCRPC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.