ArticleInterdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases2026
Identifying Early Signals From Emerging Public Health Events Using Natural Language Processing.
Article in Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrated Deep Learning Surveillance of Unknown Pathogens with Pandemic Potential Using Pneumonia of Unknown Etiology.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Identifying Early Signals From Emerging Public Health Events Using Natural Language Processing.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Timely detection of emerging public health threats is challenging because the surveillance infrastructure is not yet tuned to the emerging threat. We attempt to identify three nonspecific early signals that might be common across emerging events: public health authority communication, zoonotic exposure mentions, and other pathogen exposure mentions. Methods: Data from U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs emergency department visits between 2004 and 2024 were used to construct training and validation sets from reportable or emerging infectious diseases identified by historical diagnoses and laboratories. Not all early signal types were extracted using the same method. Rule-based and transformer models were used in a way to minimize developer and chart reviewer time. We then extracted cases from historic documents among selected diseases. Results: Positive predictive values for public health authority communication, zoonotic exposure, and other pathogen exposure ranged from 0.615 to 1.0. Target concepts were extracted from over 33 million emergency department visits. Distributions of extracted exposures generally matched expectations for the identified pathogen. Conclusion: Automated natural language processing methods allow surveillance scaling to large amounts of clinical documents to identify relevant cases. Initial validation compared to manual text review shows that accuracy is acceptable for initial feasibility exploration in biosurveillance efforts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.