ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2026
An Implementation Science Approach to Introducing the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Preintubation Checklist: Understanding Facilitators and Barriers.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development of implementation strategies for the National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) pre-intubation checklist: a prospective, pre-implementation planning study.Implementation science communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: The National Emergency Airway Registry for Pediatric Emergency Medicine (NEAR4PEM) developed an evidence-based preintubation checklist, but translating this quality improvement tool into improved intubation outcomes in the Pediatric Emergency Department requires attention to implementation. To optimize successful implementation, it is essential to understand multilevel implementation determinants. The objective of this study was to conduct a formative evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) to identify and assess implementation facilitators and barriers. Methods: Data were collected using focus groups. Qualitative analysis was performed using the framework matrix approach. Interprofessional focus groups composed of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and respiratory therapists were conducted at 4 purposefully sampled NEAR4PEM sites to represent varying annual visit volume, geographic location, and prior checklist experience. Barriers and facilitators were coded using CFIR domains and constructs and grouped into clinically relevant themes. Results: Nineteen key informants from 4 hospital systems noted facilitators and barriers across CFIR domains. Prominent barriers included high staff turnover, team resistance to change, and perceived lack of need for a checklist. Prominent facilitators included adequate staff training, clear identification of a leader, communication and delivery to all key informants, and adaptability of the checklist. Conclusion: Data about multilevel implementation determinants were identified to support the ongoing creation and use of an implementation blueprint, a comprehensive plan for strategies, goals, timelines, and key personnel. Future steps involve the implementation of the checklist with concurrent evaluation of implementation and patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.