Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799827›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2026

Some generalized recurrence relations for nonlinear equations by using decomposition technique with application of fractal geometry.

Farooq Ahmed Shah, Syeda Rameesha Hamdani, Fikadu Tesgera Tolasa, Iftikhar Haider

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Farooq Ahmed ShahDepartment of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock Campus, Pakistan.
Syeda Rameesha HamdaniDepartment of Physics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Pakistan.
Fikadu Tesgera TolasaDepartment of Mathematics, Dambi Dollo University, Oromia, Ethiopia.
Iftikhar HaiderDepartment of Mathematics, COMSATS University Islamabad, Attock Campus, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonlinear equations frequently appear in diverse fields of applied sciences, where real-world phenomena cannot be accurately represented by linear models. Therefore, developing efficient numerical methods to approximate the roots of such equations remain a challenging and intellectually stimulating task. These methods are crucial in physics, engineering and computer science for solving nonlinear equations. In response to the growing demands of real-time systems, complicated simulations and high-performance computing, this article introduces few novel root-finding methods that significantly improve the convergence order of the traditional approaches. Accelerated decomposition technique is to diversify different classes of iterative methods. Newly derived methods are compared with existing methods numerically as well as graphically. Polynomiography is employed to visualize the basins of attraction, providing insight into the convergence behavior and stability of the methods. The results indicate that the new algorithms not only overcome the limitations of existing techniques but also offer a visually intuitive understanding of root-finding processes. This study presents innovative root-finding methods that utilize accelerated decomposition techniques. The proposed methods demonstrate a significant improvement in convergence order compared to traditional approaches Through numerical and graphical comparisons, the newly derived methods are shown to outperform existing methods.

Indexed as

ConvergenceDecomposition methodFractalsIterative methodNewton methodQuadrature rule, Taylor series

Identifiers

PMID41799827
PMCPMC12964302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.