SynthesisFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Light and sound hypersensitivity in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review focusing on age and gender bias.
Synthesis in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Effects of light on brain-state dynamics and energy landscape.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is often characterized by hypersensitivity to sensory stimuli, with 70-90% of autistic individuals experiencing such difficulties. In environments without appropriate accommodation, these sensitivities can cause discomfort; however, current guidelines for regulating light and sound remain limited, and evidence from current research indicates a striking asymmetry across ages and genders. Objectives: This systematic review synthesized 29 studies (2015-2025) to (1): characterize distinct auditory and visual sensory hypersensitivity profiles in ASD compared to typically development (TD) controls (2); identify mechanisms of reduced habituation and impaired multisensory integration (3); quantify and critique methodological biases (age, gender, and context); and (4) map critical research gaps for inclusive environmental studies. Methods: PRISMA guidelines and registered protocol (PROSPERO: CRD420251042397). Three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus) resulted in 410 records; 29 met the strict PICO criteria, involving experimental/observational assessment of auditory or visual responses with ASD-TD comparisons. Quality assessment utilized a 16-item DISCERN instrument specifically adapted for neuroscience research. Data extraction encompassed demographic attributes (age, gender) and behavioral outcomes. Results: Most studies examined auditory stimuli, with few focusing on lighting effects. Sensory responses of autistic individuals were atypical, including reduced habituation to sounds, impaired sensory gating, and increased sensitivity to noises. A natural soundscape is more effective at regulating the body than clinical white noise. Visual research is limited, with no studies on photophobia or modern lighting. Audiovisual studies show delayed speech processing, slower adaptation to asynchrony, and reduced susceptibility to multisensory illusions, reflecting detail-focused perception. Males and children predominate in most studies, and females are underrepresented, particularly in adult studies, creating an age and gender gap. Conclusion: Addressing critical gaps and biases in autism sensory processing and therapeutic opportunities is essential. Studies should encompass gender-balanced perspectives, lifespan development, and visual hypersensitivity, incorporating ecological validity and translating findings into actionable environmental standards. Rather than perpetuating historical biases, it is crucial to prioritize the needs of underrepresented groups. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251042397, identifier CRD420251042397.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.