ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2026
Everyone Breathes: a mixed methods evaluation of a combined Feldenkrais and vocal improvisation group within an adult mental health Recovery College setting.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: A range of singing interventions exist for mental health contexts, but few have incorporated group-based body, breathwork and vocal improvisation. The Feldenkrais method has potential to support singing interventions by raising attention to body and breath. This study aimed to describe practice and evaluate experiences and outcomes of a Feldenkrais and group vocal improvisation workshop provided by professional musicians and a Feldenkrais practitioner in a Recovery College setting. Methods: We used an observational mixed methods design. The workshop was held by a Recovery College for adults living with mental health challenges. All group attendees were invited to participate in the evaluation. Those who consented completed questionnaires at the workshop beginning, end, and two weeks later. We assessed mental wellbeing alongside goals, emotions, group appraisal, un/helpful and important events. Researchers attended as participant observers and conducted a focus group on the third day. We used interpretive content analysis to understand group content and evaluations. Quantitative data were analysed descriptively. Results: Eight service users (4 male, 5 white British, mean age=43) consented to participate. Group practice was summarised following TIDieR principles and emphasised equality and collaboration. Service users were attracted to the unusual course content, with a strong wish to connect with others and learn. Feldenkrais movement facilitated authentic vocal exploration, expression and creativity. This was experienced initially with some anxiety, but later supported bonding, enjoyment and fun. Experiences were positive, with benefits relating to capacity to breathe, connection to the body, ability to express themselves and find an authentic voice, as well as gain group support. Wellbeing improved on average by 3.14 (range 1-8) to a moderate wellbeing score of 25.9 with a standard deviation (SD) of 2.9. The workshop intensity and course focus were highlighted as areas for future development. Discussion: The Everyone Breathes workshop offers an intensive, creative, and supportive experience within the Recovery College context. The pilot evaluation suggests the group was well-received, safe and has potential to improve wellbeing in a relatively short timeframe. Future research should explore how to develop content and broaden opportunities for wider implementation to enable formal assessments of effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.