ReviewFrontiers in dental medicine2026
Oral hygiene management in critically ill patients: prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Review in Frontiers in dental medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral hygiene in critically ill patients in intensive care is essential for preventing infectious complications, particularly ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), which is one of the most severe and frequent complications in these units. The management of oral health can reduce bacterial load and the risk of respiratory infections. Materials and methods: This study analyzes oral hygiene management strategies in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation through a systematic literature review following the PRISMA-ScR method. Studies published from 2000 to 2023 were examined, focusing on the comparison between mechanical plaque removal interventions and the use of chlorhexidine against other measures. Results: The results highlight that the combined use of mechanical plaque removal and chlorhexidine significantly reduces the incidence of VAP and improves oral hygiene. The analysis of the evidence suggests that standardized protocols and a multidisciplinary approach, including collaboration with dental specialists, can optimize oral health in these critically ill patients. Discussion: The collected evidence underscores the importance of oral hygiene management not only to reduce the risk of VAP but also to improve the overall well-being of patients in intensive care. It is crucial to consider each patient's specific conditions, including comorbidities, to implement personalized interventions that minimize associated risks. Despite promising results, further investigation is needed regarding the optimization of oral hygiene techniques and the standardization of protocols to ensure uniformity in clinical practices. Conclusion: The findings support the importance of adequate oral hygiene management in intensive care to reduce the risk of respiratory infections, emphasizing the need for continued research and the development of evidence-based practices that enhance clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.