ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026
Machine Learning for Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction in Early Gastric Cancer: A Comparative Analysis.
Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) plays a crucial role in informing treatment decisions and prognosis for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to offer a practical approach to predict LNM in EGC by using machine learning algorithms. Methods: This study collected data from 1085 patients with EGC who underwent radical gastrectomy with D1+ or D2 lymph node resection. Seven machine-learning algorithms were compared, and hyperparameters were fine-tuned to identify the model with the best accuracy, Brier class and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The efficacy of the selected model was evaluated. Results: Following comparison, the Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (Boost), and Neural Network (NNT) models exhibited exemplary performance on the training dataset, with AUC values of 0.796, 0.788, and 0.779, respectively, on the validation set. We conducted parallel analyses within the T1a and T1b subgroups, where Logistics Models (LM) and RF yielded AUCs of 0.710 and 0.636 in the T1a validation set, and LM, RF, and Boost achieved AUCs of 0.666, 0.658, and 0.558, respectively in the T1b validation set. Variable importance analysis utilizing SHAP revealed distinct values for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC patients, as well as in those stratified into T1a and T1b groups. Conclusion: The machine learning model holds the potential to guide more effective treatment strategies for early gastric cancer (EGC), specifically in addressing lymph node metastasis (LNM). The identified risk factors contribute valuable insights for personalized decision-making in the management of EGC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.