Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799756›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of medical sciences2026

Machine Learning for Lymph Node Metastasis Prediction in Early Gastric Cancer: A Comparative Analysis.

Yufan Chen, Kunhao Bai, Minghui Yang, Chao Ma, Xiaohang Gao, Guoliang Xu, Yingbo Chen, Rong Zhang

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yufan ChenDepartment of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Kunhao BaiDepartment of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Minghui YangDepartment of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Chao MaDepartment of Pathology, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Xiaohang GaoDepartment of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Guoliang XuDepartment of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Yingbo ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.
Rong ZhangDepartment of Endoscopy, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) plays a crucial role in informing treatment decisions and prognosis for early gastric cancer (EGC). This study aimed to offer a practical approach to predict LNM in EGC by using machine learning algorithms. Methods: This study collected data from 1085 patients with EGC who underwent radical gastrectomy with D1+ or D2 lymph node resection. Seven machine-learning algorithms were compared, and hyperparameters were fine-tuned to identify the model with the best accuracy, Brier class and Area Under the Curve (AUC). The efficacy of the selected model was evaluated. Results: Following comparison, the Random Forest (RF), Extreme Gradient Boosting (Boost), and Neural Network (NNT) models exhibited exemplary performance on the training dataset, with AUC values of 0.796, 0.788, and 0.779, respectively, on the validation set. We conducted parallel analyses within the T1a and T1b subgroups, where Logistics Models (LM) and RF yielded AUCs of 0.710 and 0.636 in the T1a validation set, and LM, RF, and Boost achieved AUCs of 0.666, 0.658, and 0.558, respectively in the T1b validation set. Variable importance analysis utilizing SHAP revealed distinct values for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in EGC patients, as well as in those stratified into T1a and T1b groups. Conclusion: The machine learning model holds the potential to guide more effective treatment strategies for early gastric cancer (EGC), specifically in addressing lymph node metastasis (LNM). The identified risk factors contribute valuable insights for personalized decision-making in the management of EGC patients.

Indexed as

Lymphatic MetastasisMachine LearningPredictive Learning ModelsStomach NeoplasmsAdultAgedArea Under CurveBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsClinical Decision-MakingElectronic Health RecordsFemaleGastrectomyHumansLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle Agedgastric cancerlymph node metastasismachine learningprediction modelprognosis

Identifiers

PMID41799756
PMCPMC12964569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.