ArticleArthroplasty today2026
Full Motion Arc, Laxity-Based Planning for Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Next Milestone for Enabling Technology.
Article in Arthroplasty today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although numerous technologies show promise to improve total knee arthroplasty outcomes, a need to further advance these solutions remains. An area for potential improvement is intraoperative efficiency by reducing the number of required surgeon and software interactions. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to compare the number of surgeon and software interactions for 9 surgical steps between a laxity-based algorithm and a historical algorithm. Methods: Technical logs of 313 total knee arthroplasties performed by 6 surgeons were reviewed. Nine surgical parameters were assessed, including bone cuts and implant positioning. These parameters were compared between the laxity-based algorithm and the historical algorithm cohorts. The number of adjustments from the initial predictive plan to the final plan was calculated for each of the 9 parameters to assess potential improvements in surgical efficiency with the laxity-based algorithm. Results: Overall, the laxity-based algorithm substantially improved the initial planning definition. The mean number of active surgeon click adjustments to the original plan decreased from 13 to 8 clicks. When assessing based on the surgeon, a mean 39% reduction in clicks was noted, ranging from a 19% reduction to a 70% reduction. Conclusions: This study exemplified the potential of an unsupervised learning algorithm in conjunction with a laxity-based device. The laxity-based algorithm substantially reduced the number of active surgeon interactions with the software, which can potentially help reduce cognitive burden and operative time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.