Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799694›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026

A Review of Traditional and Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women.

Sheran Vasanthakumar, Sarang Paleri, Emma Aldous, Shaun Khanna, Rhea Nandurkar, Esther F Davis, Andrew Lin, Nitesh Nerlekar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sheran VasanthakumarDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3378-9998
Sarang PaleriDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Emma AldousDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Shaun KhannaDepartment of Cardiology, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Rhea NandurkarDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Esther F DavisDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Andrew LinDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Nitesh NerlekarDepartment of Cardiology, Victorian Heart Hospital, Clayton, VIC, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality amongst women. While our general understanding of evaluation and treatment of CVD has greatly improved over the past decades, there is a gap in the knowledge of female specific CVD risk factors and cardiac health. Young women in particular are often unaware of their cardiovascular risk and have experienced a smaller reduction in CVD risk over time as compared to other demographics. In recent years, the variation in traditional risk factors and the identification of non-traditional risk factors have been studied as a potential avenue to identify and better address this risk. Non-traditional risk factors such as pregnancy-related hypertensive and glucose disorders have been implicated in CVD risk and may benefit from assessment. Furthermore, novel risk factors such as breast arterial calcification may provide new avenues in which to evaluate patients. While a number of variables have been identified as potential female-specific CVD risk factors, it is still unclear how this can aid risk prediction and therefore our management of CVD in women. Our review aims to summarize the current knowledge of traditional and non-traditional CVD risk factors in women and how this may implicate future management of CVD in women.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasespregnancy complicationsrisk assessmentrisk factorssex factorswomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID41799694
PMCPMC12960048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.