ReviewInternational journal of women's health2026
A Review of Traditional and Non-Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Women.
Review in International journal of women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Coronary Artery Disease in Women: Sex-Specific Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, Clinical Presentation and Management.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a significant cause of morbidity and mortality amongst women. While our general understanding of evaluation and treatment of CVD has greatly improved over the past decades, there is a gap in the knowledge of female specific CVD risk factors and cardiac health. Young women in particular are often unaware of their cardiovascular risk and have experienced a smaller reduction in CVD risk over time as compared to other demographics. In recent years, the variation in traditional risk factors and the identification of non-traditional risk factors have been studied as a potential avenue to identify and better address this risk. Non-traditional risk factors such as pregnancy-related hypertensive and glucose disorders have been implicated in CVD risk and may benefit from assessment. Furthermore, novel risk factors such as breast arterial calcification may provide new avenues in which to evaluate patients. While a number of variables have been identified as potential female-specific CVD risk factors, it is still unclear how this can aid risk prediction and therefore our management of CVD in women. Our review aims to summarize the current knowledge of traditional and non-traditional CVD risk factors in women and how this may implicate future management of CVD in women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.