ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2026
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy delivery, readmission rates, and multidisciplinary teams: a scoping review of the impact of published quality indicators.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) reduces hospitalization, yet poor standardization and implementation contribute to readmission rates near 25%. The Infectious Diseases Society of America recommends structured and multidisciplinary OPAT programs. Twelve quality indicators, spanning organization, initiation, continuation, and outcome domains, have been proposed to improve OPAT delivery. Our scoping review assessed associations between reported OPAT quality indicators and patient readmission. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from database inception through May 1, 2025, for studies of adults discharged on OPAT, managed by multidisciplinary teams, and reporting readmission rates. Data included presence of each quality indicator, team composition, and readmission rates. Readmission was categorized as low (<10%) or high (≥10%). Results: Of 2,610 studies screened, 18 (5,027 patients) met criteria. The median readmission rate was 11.3 (IQR 8-20). All studies reported a structured OPAT program and formal OPAT team. Initial patient assessment by a competent team member was more common in studies with lower readmissions. Reporting more indicators (range 4-11) did not significantly correlate with fewer readmissions. Organization and initiation indicators were reported more frequently than continuation and outcome indicators. All programs included an infectious diseases physician; 94% included nurses, 55% pharmacists, 28% social workers, and 11% hospitalists. Conclusions: Higher quantity of reported indicators did not predict fewer readmissions. Future research should explore team engagement, including potential roles of hospitalists and social workers to strengthen care transitions, and the impact of continuation and outcome indicators on readmissions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.