ArticleZooKeys2026
A comprehensive taxonomic checklist of bark and ambrosia beetle species (Curculionidae, Scolytinae).
Article in ZooKeys, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Native and non-native ambrosia beetles compete for deadwood resources.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2026Article
- The Phenotypic Landscape ofInsects · 2026Article
- Trap tales: The influence of red alder stand conditions and forest fragmentation on family-level beetle bycatch diversity.PloS one · 2026Article
- A new species ofZooKeys · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A comprehensive list of the currently (as of 17 November 2025) valid taxa of bark and ambrosia beetles of the world (Curculionidae: Scolytinae) is presented, including all tribes, genera, species (6516), and subspecies. The high diversity of scolytine species, their biosecurity significance, and the rapidly advancing understanding of their phylogenetic relationships has resulted in decentralized and often incorrect usage of names. The list represents species names accepted and used in compliance with the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature and a consensus of name usage by the community of active systematists. Species names listed here are bona fide hypotheses of biological species, but not always of confirmed biological entities; instead, the list aims to provide a foundation for the subsequent taxonomic, biological, and phylogenetic work on species resolution, and for biodiversity data management. The list is presented as a formatted checklist, as well as a Darwin-core format enabling interpolation into biodiversity information systems. Two replacement names were needed to resolve homonyms,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.