ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)
Cortical integration of tactile inputs distributed across timescales.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sensory experiences in the real world cut across timescales from milliseconds to seconds. Emerging evidence suggests that somatosensory processing is sensitive to the temporal structure of the stimuli in the sub-second scale, yet only a few select ranges within this scale have been studied. To process real-world information, the integration of tactile inputs must occur over a much broader temporal range. To address temporal integration across timescales, we studied scalp EEG signals from somatosensory cortex in response to a train of tactile stimuli presented to the fingertips with varying inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) spanning hundreds of milliseconds to several seconds. We captured the variations in cortical signals as a function of the subsequent ISIs (next interval structure). We tracked cortical tactile processing through its early (<75 ms), intermediate (75 to 150 ms), and late stages (150 to 300 ms). We find that the early and late stages of cortical activity were sensitive to the previous ISI; EEG signals were suppressed with ISIs <500 ms and enhanced with longer ISIs, with this effect persisting even when ISIs were approximately 8 s. The intermediate stage of cortical activity was sensitive to both the previous and the penultimate ISIs. Our findings suggest that the specific somatosensory cortical processing stages integrate temporal structure across timescales to enable complex sensory experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.