Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799681›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)

Cortical integration of tactile inputs distributed across timescales.

Wenyu Wan, K Richard Ridderinkhof, Arko Ghosh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wenyu WanCognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6618-1893
K Richard RidderinkhofDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arko GhoshCognitive Psychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2924-5146

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensory experiences in the real world cut across timescales from milliseconds to seconds. Emerging evidence suggests that somatosensory processing is sensitive to the temporal structure of the stimuli in the sub-second scale, yet only a few select ranges within this scale have been studied. To process real-world information, the integration of tactile inputs must occur over a much broader temporal range. To address temporal integration across timescales, we studied scalp EEG signals from somatosensory cortex in response to a train of tactile stimuli presented to the fingertips with varying inter-stimulus intervals (ISIs) spanning hundreds of milliseconds to several seconds. We captured the variations in cortical signals as a function of the subsequent ISIs (next interval structure). We tracked cortical tactile processing through its early (<75 ms), intermediate (75 to 150 ms), and late stages (150 to 300 ms). We find that the early and late stages of cortical activity were sensitive to the previous ISI; EEG signals were suppressed with ISIs <500 ms and enhanced with longer ISIs, with this effect persisting even when ISIs were approximately 8 s. The intermediate stage of cortical activity was sensitive to both the previous and the penultimate ISIs. Our findings suggest that the specific somatosensory cortical processing stages integrate temporal structure across timescales to enable complex sensory experiences.

Indexed as

ERPsomatosensorytemporal integrationtimescalestouch

Identifiers

PMID41799681
PMCPMC12961305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.