ArticleReproductive medicine and biology
Utilization of Fertility Treatment in Japan During the First Year of Insurance Coverage: Analysis of Real-World Health Claims Data.
Article in Reproductive medicine and biology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: In April 2022, fertility treatments, including assisted reproductive technology (ART), became eligible for public health insurance coverage in Japan. This study describes the prevalence and characteristics of infertility diagnoses and fertility treatments during the first year of coverage. Methods: This study analyzed claims data from 14 health insurance associations from April 2022 to March 2023. Infertility diagnoses and fertility treatments, and related comorbidities were identified via diagnosis, procedure, and drug codes. Results: Among 590,006 women and 619,551 men, the highest prevalence of infertility was seen in women (3.9%) and men (0.5%) aged 30-34 years. General fertility treatment was more common among younger women but decreased with age, while ART became more prevalent after age 35. The major prescriptions were hormone preparations for ART and luteal insufficiency among women. The diagnosis ratio of OHSS was higher than previously reported, with 8.0% to 9.6% of women undergoing fertility treatment, particularly receiving ART and younger. Male prevalence of diagnosis and treatment remained low, with multiple factors underlying access to treatment. Conclusions: Public insurance coverage improved access to fertility treatment and enhanced data standardization in Japan. This study indicates the need for targeted strategies to broaden equity in reproductive health services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.