Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799638›Full record

ArticleJPRAS open2026

Refinement of maximal levator resection for blepharoptosis correction: High incision and advancement of levator complex.

Yu-Chi Wang, Chung-Sheng Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yu-Chi WangDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chung-Sheng LaiDivision of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Maximal levator resection (MLR) is indicated for severe blepharoptosis with poor levator function (LF) but carries risks of intraoperative bleeding due to dissection above the tarsus, conjunctival perforation, and postoperative conjunctival prolapse. To address these issues, we introduce the High Incision and Advancement of Levator Complex (HIAL) technique, designed to optimizing functional and aesthetics outcomes while minimizing complications. Objectives: This study evaluates the effectiveness of HIAL technique in reducing surgical complications in severe congenital blepharoptosis. Methods: Nine pediatric patients with congenital severe blepharoptosis underwent HIAL procedure. The levator complex was dissected 8-10 mm above the superior tarsal border and extended toward Whitnall's ligament to create a 10 × 5 mm rectangular flap, which was then advanced and secured to the tarsus. Results: The mean levator resection measured 24.67 ± 0.87 mm. Postoperative outcomes demonstrated significant improvements in palpebral fissure height (PFH), marginal reflex distance 1 (MRD1), and LF (all Conclusions: The HIAL technique may represent a feasible and potentially effective option for managing severe blepharoptosis with poor LF, providing both functional and aesthetic benefits while reducing surgical complications.

Indexed as

BlepharoptosisConjunctival perforationHigh levator incisionMaximal levator resection

Identifiers

PMID41799638
PMCPMC12961211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.