Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799617›Full record

ArticleFood chemistry: X2026

Commercial pea protein ingredients: a multiscale investigation of high-pressure homogenized emulsification and relation with physicochemical and interfacial properties.

Yuqi Zhang, Åsmund Rinnan, Jacob J K Kirkensgaard, Milena Corredig, Vibeke Orlien

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food chemistry: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuqi ZhangDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Åsmund RinnanDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Jacob J K KirkensgaardDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
Milena CorredigDepartment of Food Science, Aarhus University, Agro Food Park 48, 8200 Aarhus N, Denmark.
Vibeke OrlienDepartment of Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, Rolighedsvej 26, DK-1958 Frederiksberg C, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Utilization of commercial pea protein (PP) in food emulsions largely depends on empirical experience due to insufficient knowledge. Emulsions made of seven commercial PP ingredients by high-pressure homogenization (HPH) were studied and uncovered their relationship with physicochemical and interfacial properties of homogenized PP. Results showed that HPH produced PP supernatants of varying size and composition, leading to differences in interfacial adsorption of emulsions. Four emulsions had very small droplets (1.1-2.7 μm), in contrast to one with medium sized droplets (5.8 μm) and two with large droplets (> 10 μm). The oil droplet size was highly correlated with the protein content and size in the soluble phase, suggesting that emulsification was mainly driven by soluble proteins after homogenization. Moreover, small droplet size was not a prerequisite to flocculation and coalescence stability. During storage, emulsions showed different mechanisms of destabilization. Overall, these results provided an accurate assessment of commercial PPs as emulsifiers, aiding the development of predictive models.

Indexed as

Commercial pea proteinEmulsificationEmulsion stabilityHigh-pressure homogenization (HPH)Interfacial behaviorSolubility

Identifiers

PMID41799617
PMCPMC12963997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.