Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799608›Full record

ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Hirotaka Konishi, Hiroyuki Inoue, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Atsushi Shiozaki

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hirotaka KonishiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4899-8944
Hiroyuki InoueDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.
Hitoshi FujiwaraDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6507-4313
Atsushi ShiozakiDivision of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Kyoto Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3739-160X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy with regional variations in histological subtypes. Adenocarcinoma predominates in Western countries, whereas squamous cell carcinoma is more common in Asia. Despite advances in multimodal therapy, esophagectomy remains the cornerstone of curative treatment, and the development of various minimally invasive esophagectomies (MIE) has been promoted to reduce invasiveness and complications. The status of the MIE has been outlined. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed/MEDLINE to identify relevant studies on MIE published up to June 2025. The search focused on thoracoscopic, robot-assisted, and mediastinoscopic approaches, with an emphasis on randomized trials and high-quality comparative studies. Results: Thoracoscopic MIE, especially in the prone position, demonstrated reduced pulmonary complications and shorter recovery times than open surgery, as supported by randomized trials such as TIME, MIRO, and MONET. Robot-assisted MIE (RAMIE) further enhances lymph node dissection and improves preservation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, as demonstrated in trials such as REVATE and RAMIE. Mediastinoscopic esophagectomy via the transcervical and transhiatal approaches is emerging as a promising alternative for high-risk patients, offering favorable perioperative outcomes with reduced pulmonary complications. Further evaluation is required to determine the efficacy of lymph node dissection and the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve damage. Conclusion: MIE, including the thoracoscopic, robot-assisted, and mediastinoscopic approaches, is evolving into an effective and less invasive alternative to open surgery. Future research should focus on conducting standardized, multicenter trials to establish optimal surgical strategies based on tumor characteristics and patient-specific factors.

Indexed as

esophageal cancermediastinoscopyminimally invasive esophagectomyrobot‐assisted laparoscopythoracoscopy

Identifiers

PMID41799608
PMCPMC12962032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.