ReviewAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Current Status of Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategies for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Advanced Systemic Therapies.
Review in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been transformed by recent advancements in systemic therapies, particularly with the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, expanding treatment options beyond conventional locoregional approaches. This review provides an overview of evidence accumulated from recent Phase III trials of first-line regimens and key second-line agents and examines how these advances enable multidisciplinary treatment strategies and timely transition to curative local treatments. We highlight prospective and retrospective data on systemic therapy administered in combination with or in sequence with locoregional treatment modalities, including TACE-based combinations and "conversion" concepts leading to resection. A central focus is the oncological resectability criteria proposed by the Japan Liver Cancer Association and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, which provide an objective framework to assess surgical indications under contemporary systemic therapy. Validation studies have consistently demonstrated robust prognostic stratification across resectable (R), borderline resectable 1 (BR1), and borderline resectable 2 (BR2) categories. Evidence for application of the oncological resectability criteria in treatment decision-making is still insufficient. Thus, future prospective studies and real-world registries aligned with the resectability framework are essential for defining the optimal timing, sequencing, and candidacy for surgery to ultimately enable provision of individualized, evidence-based care for patients with advanced HCC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.