ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Impact of Circular Stapler Size on Short-Term Outcomes and Long-Term Quality of Life After McKeown Esophagectomy.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The circular stapling technique (CST) is reported to be a simple and time-efficient method; however, it is associated with a high incidence of anastomotic stenosis for McKeown esophagectomy. Meanwhile, the impact of circular stapler size remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the impact of circular stapler size on both short-term outcomes and long-term quality of life (QOL) after McKeown esophagectomy. Methods: In total, 63 consecutive patients who underwent McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer between 2019 and 2022 were eligible. We examined the association between circular stapler size and short-term outcomes and long-term QOL using the PGSAS-37. Results: 35 (55.6%) patients underwent anastomosis with a 21 mm stapler, whereas 28 (44.4%) patients used a 23 mm stapler. No significant differences were observed between the groups. The incidence of anastomotic leakage did not differ significantly between the groups (5.7% vs. 7.1%, Conclusions: Short-term outcomes did not differ between patients who underwent anastomosis with a 21 mm stapler and those with a 23 mm stapler, however QOL, particularly the feeling of dysphagia, was worse in patients who used a 21 mm stapler compared to those who used a 23 mm stapler.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.