Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799590›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026

Intraoperative Evaluation of Bladder Perfusion Using Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Imaging During Total Pelvic Exenteration After Interruption of Blood Flow From the Internal Iliac Vessels.

Mamoru Uemura, Chikako Kusunoki, Mao Osaki, Hiroshi Kusafuka, Satoshi Higuchi, Yuki Sekido, Mitsunobu Takeda, Tsuyoshi Hata, Atsushi Hamabe, Takayuki Ogino and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Mamoru UemuraDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6285-5619
Chikako KusunokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1344-7277
Mao OsakiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8814-9792
Hiroshi KusafukaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.
Satoshi HiguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.
Yuki SekidoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.
Mitsunobu TakedaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.
Tsuyoshi HataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.
Atsushi HamabeDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.
Takayuki OginoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5435-4144
Norikatsu MiyoshiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1113-8884
Koji MunakataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Ikeda City Hospital Ikeda Japan.
Hirofumi OtaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery Ikeda City Hospital Ikeda Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8659-6700
Yuichiro DokiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.
Hidetoshi EguchiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine The University of Osaka Suita Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2318-1129

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer, concomitant resection of the internal iliac vessels is sometimes required. Because the bladder receives its primary blood supply from branches of the internal iliac artery, concerns arise regarding bladder perfusion when these vessels are resected. However, the extent to which bladder perfusion depends on the internal iliac system remains unclear. Methods: Between 2020 and 2023, 25 patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer who underwent total pelvic exenteration (TPE) with bilateral LLND were prospectively enrolled. After division of all ventral branches of the internal iliac vessels, including the umbilical, obturator, and vesical vessels, bladder perfusion was evaluated intraoperatively using indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging. Time to visualization of bladder perfusion was recorded. Results: Bladder perfusion was successfully visualized in all patients without complications. Median time to visualization was 30 s (interquartile range, 20-50). Perfusion originated exclusively from the pubic side, and fluorescence of the entire bladder wall was confirmed after mobilization. Patients were classified into early (≤ 30 s) and delayed (> 30 s) visualization groups. Older age was significantly associated with delayed visualization ( Conclusions: Bladder perfusion was maintained even after complete interruption of both arterial supply and venous drainage from the internal iliac vessels, owing to blood supply from the pubic side. These findings support the safety of internal iliac vessel resection during extended LLND in rectal cancer surgery.

Indexed as

bladder perfusionIndocyanine green fluorescence imaginginternal iliac vesselslateral lymph node dissectionrectal cancer

Identifiers

PMID41799590
PMCPMC12962017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.