ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery With Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Large Superficial Non-Ampullary Duodenal Epithelial Tumors.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) poses substantial technical challenges, primarily because of a heightened risk of adverse events (AEs). Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (D-LECS) was introduced to address these risks, with recent advancements extending its application to larger tumors, including those on the pancreatic side of the duodenum. This study evaluated the safety and feasibility of D-LECS combined with ESD and seromuscular reinforcement for large SNADETs (≥ 30 mm). Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with SNADETs who underwent D-LECS with ESD from October 2013 to October 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of AEs graded Clavien-Dindo II or higher. Secondary outcomes included delayed perforation, delayed bleeding, delayed gastric emptying, stenosis, intra-abdominal fluid collection, and rates of Results: Fifty patients were analyzed: 19 with tumors ≥ 30 mm, 31 with tumors < 30 mm, and 21 requiring pancreatic-side dissection. Primary AE incidence was 6.5% (95% CI: 1.8-20.7) for tumors < 30 mm, 5.3% (95% CI: 0.9-24.6) for tumors ≥ 30 mm, 6.9% (95% CI: 1.9-22.0) without pancreatic-side dissection, and 4.8% (95% CI: 0.8-22.7) with pancreatic-side dissection. Secondary outcomes indicated no increased risk from tumor size or pancreatic-side dissection. Conclusions: D-LECS with ESD and seromuscular reinforcement represents a safe and feasible strategy for large SNADETs, including pancreatic-side lesions, with minimal AE rates, supporting its broader application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.