ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026
Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Cancer as an Alternative Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Survival Impact of Preoperative Hemoglobin-to-Red Cell Distribution Width Ratio in Stage I Gastric Cancer Treated with Curative Surgery.JMA journal · 2026Article
- Comment on "Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Cancer as an Alternative Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study".Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
- Response to Letter to the Editor Regarding "Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Cancer as an Alternative Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study".Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a minimally invasive procedure that preserves gastric function and reduces complications. Although widely applied for gastrointestinal stromal tumors, its role in gastric cancer remains uncertain. We prospectively evaluated LECS as an alternative for elderly gastric cancer patients who declined conventional gastrectomy. Methods: This single-center prospective study enrolled 20 patients aged 75-89 years with gastric cancer ≤ 5 cm. All patients underwent Inverted-LECS using the Crown method. The primary endpoint was surgery-related morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III). Secondary endpoints were operative outcomes, margin status, quality of life (QOL), and survival. Results: Median age was 82 years, and 80% were cT1. No intraoperative complications or conversions occurred. Surgical morbidity ≥ Grade III was 0%. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 25%, all Grade II. Resection margins were negative in 80%, including all pathologically early cancers. At 3 months, body weight and fat-free mass were preserved, physical function scores recovered to baseline, and mental function improved. Ninety-day mortality was 0%. With a median follow-up of 32 months, disease progression occurred in six patients, mainly with advanced disease or positive margins. One- and 3-year overall survival rates were 95% and 76.2%, and disease-specific survival 95% and 90%. Conclusions: LECS was technically safe and feasible for elderly gastric cancer patients ineligible for gastrectomy. However, because oncological curability cannot be assured in advanced gastric cancer or high-grade lymph node metastasis, careful selection and informed consent are essential. LECS may serve as a functional-preserving alternative to observation or palliative treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.