Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799584›Full record

ArticleAnnals of gastroenterological surgery2026

Laparoscopic and Endoscopic Cooperative Surgery for Gastric Cancer as an Alternative Treatment in Elderly Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Marie Washio, Keishi Yamashita, Takuya Wada, Mikiko Sakuraya, Hiroki Harada, Tadashi Higuchi, Koshi Kumagai, Yasushi Orihashi, Chika Kusano, Naoki Hiki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Marie WashioDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.
Keishi YamashitaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8492-0300
Takuya WadaDepartment of Gastroenterology Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.
Mikiko SakurayaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.
Hiroki HaradaDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1983-4692
Tadashi HiguchiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1935-3669
Koshi KumagaiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.
Yasushi OrihashiClinical Research Promotion Center Kitasato University Hospital Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.
Chika KusanoDepartment of Gastroenterology Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.
Naoki HikiDepartment of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery Kitasato University School of Medicine Sagamihara Kanagawa Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6857-8736

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a minimally invasive procedure that preserves gastric function and reduces complications. Although widely applied for gastrointestinal stromal tumors, its role in gastric cancer remains uncertain. We prospectively evaluated LECS as an alternative for elderly gastric cancer patients who declined conventional gastrectomy. Methods: This single-center prospective study enrolled 20 patients aged 75-89 years with gastric cancer ≤ 5 cm. All patients underwent Inverted-LECS using the Crown method. The primary endpoint was surgery-related morbidity (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III). Secondary endpoints were operative outcomes, margin status, quality of life (QOL), and survival. Results: Median age was 82 years, and 80% were cT1. No intraoperative complications or conversions occurred. Surgical morbidity ≥ Grade III was 0%. Delayed gastric emptying occurred in 25%, all Grade II. Resection margins were negative in 80%, including all pathologically early cancers. At 3 months, body weight and fat-free mass were preserved, physical function scores recovered to baseline, and mental function improved. Ninety-day mortality was 0%. With a median follow-up of 32 months, disease progression occurred in six patients, mainly with advanced disease or positive margins. One- and 3-year overall survival rates were 95% and 76.2%, and disease-specific survival 95% and 90%. Conclusions: LECS was technically safe and feasible for elderly gastric cancer patients ineligible for gastrectomy. However, because oncological curability cannot be assured in advanced gastric cancer or high-grade lymph node metastasis, careful selection and informed consent are essential. LECS may serve as a functional-preserving alternative to observation or palliative treatment.

Indexed as

elderly gastric cancerlaparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgeryminimally invasive surgerypalliative surgeryquality of life

Identifiers

PMID41799584
PMCPMC12962026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.