ArticleCanadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD2026
Pilot validation of the new Canadian Caries Risk Assessment Tool for preschoolers.
Article in Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Equity or Two-Tier Care? Guardrails for Silver Diamine Fluoride and Delegated Early Childhood Caries Pathways.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Caries risk assessment (CRA) is an important step in preventive and therapeutic management of caries in children. This study assessed the sensitivity and specificity of a new Canadian Caries Risk Assessment Tool (<6 years) for preschoolers to predict caries development. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, CRA was performed at baseline and 12 months among 190 children aged <6 years from 3 clinics in Manitoba, Canada. CRA included information on child's fluoride exposure, teeth cleaning, diet, socio-economic status, and oral examinations. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated, and logistic regression for new caries at follow-up was performed. Results: The sensitivity and specificity for baseline CRA rating and development of new caries at follow-up were 87.2% and 42.7%, respectively. Presence of visible caries and/or past evidence of dental treatment for caries at baseline was the strongest independent indicator of new caries by follow-up (OR = 6.49; CI = 3.28, 12.85; Discussion: The combined sensitivity and specificity score is comparable to findings from other studies examining CRA. Results support the increased weighting of the score for the presence of visible caries and/or evidence of dental treatment for caries at baseline. Results from this study provide evidence for the CRA tool's predictability. Conclusion: The Canadian Caries Risk Assessment Tool for preschoolers has high sensitivity to identify children with high caries risk, and modest specificity to identify children with low caries risk. However, future population-based studies with primary care providers are recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41799549PMC12962308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.