ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Generative AI-driven synthetic media risks in digital health: implications for telemedicine and teledentistry.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large language models for post-discharge follow-up in erectile dysfunction care: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2026Review
- Operational integrity screening for telemedicine workflows: an explainable motion and audiovisual coherence framework.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in diffusion-based and neural rendering architectures have enabled the creation of synthetic audiovisual content that closely replicates natural facial dynamics, speech production, and environmental context. These developments pose a growing risk to clinical medicine and dentistry, where authentic audiovisual data support remote clinical assessment, communication, and medico-legal documentation. This study introduces an interpretable multimodal framework for deepfake detection that integrates visual, acoustic, and cross-modal coherence features, with decision thresholds derived exclusively from authentic recordings to ensure transparency and forensic accountability. Using the DeepFake RealWorld dataset comprising 46,371 audiovisual clips, including 77% with audio, we evaluated 47 descriptors across optical, bioacoustic, and synchronization domains. Clinical relevance was evaluated through simulated dental teleconsultations. Cross-modal metrics, particularly lip-speech synchrony (Δp = 0.21-0.22), phoneme-viseme alignment (Δp = 0.21), a widely used audio visual consistency cue in multimodal deepfake detection, identity coherence (Δp = 0.19), and scene-audio semantic consistency (Δp = 0.18) demonstrated the strongest discriminatory performance, with prevalence ratios of up to 2.7. Acoustic markers, including reduced jitter, shimmer, and shortened reverberation time (RT60; 0.12 s in synthetic vs. 0.28 s in real recordings), provided additional robustness. The framework maintained performance degradation below 15% under platform-scale compression and recapture artifacts. Additionally, the proposed framework was benchmarked against a standard open-source texture-oriented baseline detector based on the Xception architecture, with clip-level ROC AUC and balanced accuracy reported on the original clips and under the same platform transformations used in the robustness analysis. Simulated dental teleconsultations revealed that manipulated recordings introduce inconsistencies in mandibular motion, prosody-related facial dynamics, and ambient acoustic plausibility (mean Δp = 0.18; PR = 2.3), confirming the clinical relevance of multimodal coherence analysis. These results position coherence-based detection as a reliable, transparent, and domain-appropriate approach for safeguarding audiovisual integrity in remote dentistry, medicine, and related digital health applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.