ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Centering transgender and gender nonconforming people of color in the study of minority stress, transition-related factors, and mental health.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transgender and gender non-conforming individuals (TGNC) people of color (POC) are exposed to a unique intersection of gender and racial-minority stressors. Distal (external) and proximal (internalized) stressors have been studied within the Gender Minority Stress Model, which outlays the adverse mental/physical health outcomes that often occur due to gender-minority stress. Few studies have examined the intersectionality of racial-minority related stress, mostly utilizing White TGNC samples, limiting generalizability to TGNC POC. Methods: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey ( Results: 91.3% desired a legal name change and a gender marker change (98%). Less than 60% who wanted changes were able to obtain them, reporting negative outcomes using incongruent documents. Additionally, 78.2% of those who wanted gender affirmative hormone therapy were able to obtain it ( Conclusion: Findings emphasize intersectionality and internalization of those stressors on gender congruence, anxiety, and depression, highlighting the importance of culturally humble, accessible services. The high frequency of adverse experiences due to document incongruence highlights the importance of policies that reduce barriers. Future research should strengthen congruence measurement with longitudinal designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.