ReviewFrontiers in drug delivery2026
Local delivery of tranexamic acid for hemorrhage control in trauma: a narrative review.
Review in Frontiers in drug delivery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Uncontrolled hemorrhage, often accompanied by trauma-induced coagulopathy is a leading cause of preventable death, accounting for 30%-40% of trauma fatalities. Tranexamic acid (TXA), an antifibrinolytic agent, has been extensively studied and proven effective when administered systemically early in severe trauma. However, intravenous (IV) administration poses logistical challenges in prehospital and combat settings, and potential risk of thrombosis. Emerging strategies aim to enhance TXA delivery through localized systems and alternative routes. Objective: The review explores non-IV routes of delivering TXA for hemorrhage control in trauma, focusing on local, intramuscular (IM), intraosseous (IO), and oral routes, and novel delivery systems. Methods: A comprehensive synthesis of preclinical and clinical studies was conducted, focusing on the material preparation, characterization, hemostatic efficacy, pharmacokinetics and practical applicability of novel TXA delivery platforms. Results: Polymeric, inorganic, and composite materials demonstrated enhanced local hemostasis through rapid clot formation and multifunctional properties. Self-propelling systems enabled autonomous penetration into deep wounds, improving clotting time and survival in animal models. IM and IO routes achieved rapid systemic TXA levels comparable to IV as confirmed in both human and animal studies, while oral TXA showed limited utility in acute trauma. Despite promising results, clinical studies on local TXA delivery especially biomaterials-based and self-propelling delivery systems in trauma remain scarce. Conclusion: TXA demonstrates effectiveness in hemorrhage control through local delivery, either integrated with hemostatic materials or administered via IM and IO routes as practical alternatives to IV infusion in emergency settings. Future research should prioritize formulation optimization, integration of smart features for controlled release, and clinical validation to enable widespread adoption in prehospital and battlefield environments. While topical TXA has shown safety and efficacy in surgical contexts, additional clinical trials are required to confirm its role in traumatic hemorrhage and establish standardized protocols. These innovations offer practical and physiological advantages for managing bleeding, particularly in resource-limited and battlefield environments. Further research is needed to validate safety, scalability, and clinical efficacy across diverse trauma scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.