ArticleBrain & spine2026
Time cost of the intraoperative CT in dorsal spinal fusion surgery in degenerative spinal disorders - a retrospective analysis of 518 degenerative cases.
Article in Brain & spine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: To evaluate the impact of intraoperative CT (ioCT)-based navigation on surgery duration, non-surgical anesthesia time, and postoperative length of stay in posterior spinal fusion procedures for degenerative spinal disorders, while accounting for surgeon performance and other procedural factors. Research question: Does the intraoperative CT use prolong the surgery, and does it affect short term recovery. Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 518 cases of dorsal spinal fusion performed with or without ioCT between 2013 and 2018 for degenerative spinal disorders. Demographic and clinical variables such as the number of screws implanted, use of cages, revision status and the surgical volume of the performing surgeon. Surgery duration and postoperative length of stay were assessed using generalized linear models (GLMs). Results: The mean age of the cohort was 65.67 years (52.5 % female). ioCT-based navigation was employed in 209 of 518 cases (40.3 %). After multivariable adjustment, ioCT increased skin-to-skin time by 38.1 min in the full cohort. The effect persisted in both prespecified subgroups, adding 39.2 min in complex procedures (≥6 screws, ≥4 cages, or iliac screws; n = 233) and 40.2 min in non-complex procedures (n = 285). High-volume surgeons (>50 cases) shortened operative time by ≈ 35 min ioCT showed no significant influence on postoperative length of stay. Discussion and conclusion: Intraoperative CT-based navigation modestly increases surgical and procedural time. IoCT use did not affect postoperative hospital stay in our analysis, neither improving the short term outcome through better accuracy nor worsening the outcomes through the effects of prolonged surgery time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.