ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease2026
Right ventricular outflow tract stenting for obstructive lesions in adult congenital heart disease.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Congenital heart disease, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, the use of stents in the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) has been described as alternative for palliation in neonates with Tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) and critical infundibular stenosis, who are not candidates for total correction in a single stage. However, there is limited evidence of the benefit of this intervention in other clinical scenarios, and just a few reports in adults. A retrospective study was conducted on 23 patients with significant RVOT obstruction who underwent RVOT stent placement and were not considered candidates for surgery. Patients 17 years old at the time of the procedure at our institution were included. Median age at the time of procedure was 24 years (IQR 17-49). 34.8% had univentricular heart physiology. The most frequent diagnosis was ToF (43.5%). 56.5% had at least one previous systemic-pulmonary shunt. In 69.5% of the cases the clinical context that led to stent placement was due to an emergency, primarily thrombosis of a systemic-pulmonary shunt (43.5%). RVOT stent implantation was successful in 100% of the cases. There were 2 procedure-related deaths (8.7%). The median stent patency time was 18.7 months (IQR 0-112 months). This is the first study that demonstrates the feasibility of RVOT stenting as a palliative method in adult patients with congenital heart disease in emergency settings. In addition to showing the possibility of its use in univentricular hearts, it demonstrates the long-term durability of RVOT stents as a palliative method, something never previously reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.