Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799328›Full record

ArticleBJUI compass2026

Identifying recurrent stone formers with machine learning: A single-centre observational study.

Pedro Amado, Daniel G Fuster, Matteo Bargagli, Dominik Obrist, Fiona Burkhard, Beat Roth, Francesco Clavica, Shaokai Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJUI compass, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Pedro AmadoARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-2191
Daniel G FusterDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Matteo BargagliDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Dominik ObristARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Fiona BurkhardDepartment of Urology Kantonsspital Aarau Aarau Switzerland.
Beat RothDepartment of Urology, Inselspital Bern University Hospital Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7369-650X
Francesco ClavicaARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland.
Shaokai ZhengARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research University of Bern Bern Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3688-0719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Kidney stones affect 12% of the population over their lifetime. Recurrent kidney stones lead to repeated interventions and excessive healthcare costs. Despite progress in imaging and metabolic evaluations, models to accurately identify patients at high risk are missing. In this study, we investigate whether machine learning methods can facilitate early identification of recurrent kidney stone formers. Patients and Methods: This observational study included data from the single-centric Bern Kidney Stone Registry. Each participant had at least one stone episode. Different data imputation techniques, such as kernel density estimation (KDE) imputation, median imputation and Results: A total of 706 patients (median age, 47, 71.2% male) were included, and 563 (79.7%) had recurrent stone events. The median imputation yielded the best-performing models. A mean receiver operating characteristic curve area under the curve (AUC) of 0.71 ± 0.03 was achieved on the held-out test set. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (OR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.42-0.49), age at first stone episode (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.46-0.56), oxalate (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.43-2.23) and pH (OR = 1.74, 95% CI: 1.47-1.89) were among the most descriptive features. Conclusion: Routinely collected clinical and laboratory variables can be potentially exploited to identify recurrent stone formers, and our machine learning approach achieved better performance than previously reported work. With further validation on external datasets, our routine could support clinicians in designing dietary, medical or surveillance strategies, thereby reducing recurrence rates and improving long-term outcomes for patients with stone-forming conditions.

Indexed as

classificationkidney stonemachine learningrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID41799328
PMCPMC12966608

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.