ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2025
A Population-Specific Ensemble Machine Learning Model for Predicting Borderline or Malignancy Risk of Ovarian Masses in Macao: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preoperative discrimination between benign and malignant ovarian tumors is important. The applicability of published prediction tools may be limited across different health systems. We aim to develop a machine learning model specifically for Macao's population to predict the borderline or malignancy risk of ovarian masses using routinely available clinical data in Macao's health system. Methods: The study cohorts were derived from 2 major hospitals in Macao, including 496 patients who underwent oophorectomy or cystectomy for ovarian masses at CHCSJ between January 2014 and December 2023, along with a simulated prospective cohort of 95 patients from CHCSJ between January 2024 and November 2024, and an external validation cohort of 61 patients from KWH between January 2020 and September 2024. Patients' clinical information, ultrasound features, and laboratory test results before initial treatment were collected. LASSO regression was used for feature selection, and classifiers were developed using various machine learning algorithms. The predictions were compared with postoperative pathological diagnoses. The predictive performance was also compared with the RMI-4. Results: Age, menopausal status, 5 ultrasound features, and 7 laboratory tests were identified as predictors of borderline and malignant ovarian tumors. An ensemble learning model based on a voting classifier was selected as the final model. Our model outperformed RMI-4 in the internal test set, simulated prospective cohort, and external validation cohort, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.923-0.951 (vs 0.810-0.868, Conclusions: We propose a machine learning model targeting Macao's population for predicting the borderline or malignancy risk of ovarian masses. Our model is accurate, low-cost, easily accessible, and interpretable. On the basis of no workflow changes, machine learning techniques can maximize the predictive potential of routinely available clinical data in a specific health system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.