ReviewJournal of translational autoimmunity2026
Intrathecal immunoglobulin production in the diagnosis, prognosis, and monitoring of autoimmune diseases of the central nervous system.
Review in Journal of translational autoimmunity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrathecal immunoglobulin production is a hallmark of central nervous system (CNS) inflammation and can be observed in autoimmune disorders of the CNS, primarily multiple sclerosis (MS), but also in other inflammatory conditions such as MOG antibody disease (MOGAD) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with aquaporin-4 antibodies (NMOSD-AQP4), as well as autoimmune encephalitis (AE). The assessment of intrathecal synthesis of immunoglobulins involves the detection of IgG oligoclonal bands (OCBs) via isoelectric focusing, the gold standard method, and the more recently developed automated kappa index. In MS, both markers possess equivalent diagnostic and prognostic value, and their potential utility in monitoring anti-humoral MS therapies is currently under investigation. Conversely, the absence of OCBs and a negative kappa index support the diagnosis of MOGAD and NMOSD-AQP4, given the low OCBs prevalence in these disorders. In MOGAD and NMOSD-AQP4, the prognostic and therapeutic predictive value of OCBs and the kappa index at baseline and during follow-up remains preliminary, with ongoing studies yielding variable results. As for AE, OCBs detection has been incorporated into diagnostic criteria exclusively in cases of NMDAR encephalitis and seronegative AE and have demonstrated usefulness as prognosis factor, the usefulness as monitoring tool being investigated. The detection of specific autoantibodies in serum and/or CSF is also integrated in diagnostic criteria of these diseases. Future approaches in monitoring CNS autoimmune disorders are likely to combine intrathecal immunoglobulin detection with other biomarkers such as serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL), indicative of neuronal injury, and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), reflective of astrocytic damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.