Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799302›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2026

Men's involvement in contraception: a qualitative study exploring the perceptions and practices of general practitioners in France.

Sarah Zaalouni, Delphine Teigné, Rosalie Rousseau, Pauline Jeanmougin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sarah ZaalouniNantes University, Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes, France.
Delphine TeignéNantes University, Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes, France.
Rosalie RousseauNantes University, Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes, France.
Pauline JeanmouginNantes University, Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Nantes, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore French general practitioners' (GPs) views and practices regarding men's involvement in contraception. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study between March and November 2023 with 15 GPs from three primary care facilities in western France. Three focus groups (five GPs per site) were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed iteratively using a thematic approach inspired by grounded theory, following Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research Results: Three conceptual categories emerged: (1) diverse perceptions and increasing involvement of men in contraception; (2) variation in professional practices and knowledge; (3) a normative and institutional environment that hinders male involvement. While some participants described evolving social expectations, contraceptive responsibility was still largely perceived as female. Gender-related norms and knowledge gaps influenced perceptions and options presented to patients, limiting fully informed choice. However, some participants challenged these norms and sought to encourage patients to reconsider their options. Conclusion: This study provides new insights into the perceptions and practices of GPs regarding men's involvement in contraception. It highlights the need to strengthen training on contraceptive methods and encourage reflection on gender issues, and suggests that public policies and pharmaceutical initiatives could support fairer practices.

Indexed as

ContraceptionGeneral practitionerHealth worker preferencesPatient preferencesQualitative research reportUnplanned pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID41799302
PMCPMC12963914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.