ArticleOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2026
Bite by bite: Exposing hidden tick-borne disease risks among Nigeria's ruminant livestock workers.
Article in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tick-borne diseases pose a significant global threat, with individuals in livestock-related occupations at high risk. This study assessed the risk factors for tick-borne viral diseases among pastoralist herdsmen and abattoir workers in Kwara State of Nigeria, a critical region for livestock movement. A cross-sectional study was conducted among 374 livestock workers (125 herdsmen; 249 abattoir workers), using structured questionnaires and observational assessments. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and multivariable logistic regression. We identified a high prevalence of risky practices and significant knowledge gaps. Among herdsmen, 79.2% reported tick bites, 80.8% crushed ticks barehanded, and 82.4% found ticks in their bedrooms. For abattoir workers, 69.9% had tick exposure, 89.6% did not use gloves, and 88% sustained work injuries, with most continuing to work untreated. Critically, 50.2% of abattoir workers consumed raw meat. Over 94% of all participants were unaware of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF). Multinomial regression revealed that age, lack of education, and specific practices like inadequate protective clothing significantly influenced risk across locations. Observational data confirmed severe infrastructural deficits in abattoirs, including no running water or tick control programs. This occupational group demonstrates multiple high-risk zoonotic behaviours amidst a severe lack of awareness, situated within inadequate infrastructure. This combination creates a highly conducive environment for the silent transmission of pathogens like CCHF virus. Urgent, integrated public health interventions, including targeted education and enforced safety protocols, are needed to mitigate this threat.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.