ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2026
Comparison of analgesic efficacy of ropivacaine versus ropivacaine plus dexmedetomidine in modified thoracolumbar interfascial plane block in patients undergoing lumbar disc surgeries: A randomised controlled trial.
Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dexmedetomidine versus magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to ropivacaine in ilioinguinal-iliohypogastric nerve block for inguinal hernia repair: A randomised controlled trial.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Regional research impact strengthening the national academics in geographical diversities.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aims: Inadequate pain control can cause a delay in recovery; hence, adequate analgesia is of much importance. The thoracolumbar interfascial plane (TLIP) block is a relatively newer block which has shown promising effects in pain control. In this study, we aim to determine the efficacy and safety of dexmedetomidine in enhancing the impact of local anaesthetic in TLIP block in patients undergoing lumbar surgeries. Methods: 60 patients aged 18-70 years were randomised to Group Plain [modified TLIP block with 20 mL of 0.25% ropivacaine bilaterally with general anaesthesia (GA)] and Group Dexmed (modified TLIP block with 0.25% ropivacaine along with 0.5 µg/kg dexmedetomidine bilaterally with GA). The primary outcome was to assess the total perioperative opioid consumption in the first 24 h. The secondary outcomes were to assess pain score upon arriving in the post-anaesthesia care unit, time to first analgesic need after surgery, postoperative opioid consumption in 24 h, and incidence of adverse events, including nausea and vomiting. Continuous variables were analysed using an independent Results: The total perioperative opioid consumption in Group Plain was 653.33 [standard deviation (SD): 250.4 µg] and that in Group Dexmed was 523.6 (SD: 258.6 µg), with a mean difference of 129.67 [95% confidence interval (CI): -1.89, 261.22] ( Conclusion: TLIP block with dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant did not decrease cumulative fentanyl consumption as compared to TLIP block with ropivacaine alone. But the time to first request of analgesia was increased in the Group Dexmed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.