ArticleJournal of medical biochemistry2025
Noninvasive prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormality screening in in vitro fertilisation elderly pregnant women in northwest China.
Article in Journal of medical biochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The study aimed to explore the value of using noninvasive prenatal tests (NIPT) in the second trimester of pregnancy for chromosomal abnormality screening in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in elderly pregnant women and to analyse the reasons for inconsistent screening results in northwest China. Methods: A total of 47,286 pregnant women aged 19-51 who underwent prenatal examinations were collected. NIPT detection found that the positive rate of pregnant women aged > 35 with spontaneous pregnancy was 0.78% , and the positive rate of IVF pregnancy was 0.82%. Then, the detection accuracy of NIPT for pregnant women aged >35 with IVF was further analysed. Results: NIPT's sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value in detecting common chromosomal aneuploidies (T21, T18, and T13) in pregnant women aged >35 who received IVF were 99.72% , 99.78% , and 66.45% , respectively. The mean gestational age, pregnancy number, AFP, and free b-HCG significantly differed between the positive and false positive groups (P < 0.05). Logistic analysis showed that the mean gestational age and AFP were independent risk factors for the failure of NIPT diagnosis (P < 0.05). Conclusions: NIPT has a particular detection performance for common chromosomal aneuploidies IVF in pregnant women. However, factors affecting detection accuracies must be considered when using it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.