ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2026
Co-creating an antenatal care information resource in Arabic with re-settled migrant mothers.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Arabic-speaking women newly settled in the UK have different experiences of healthcare in their original countries which influence their engagement with the NHS. Like other migrant women, they are often unaccustomed to the way health services work. Language, religious and cultural barriers, as well as the lack of family and community supports contribute to inequalities in health and wellbeing outcomes during pregnancy and childbirth. Materials and methods: To address their needs, the ERicar2 project aimed to produce a co-created antenatal care community information resource with a group of these women. Ten participatory workshops over eleven weeks were conducted to listen to the women's stories of their pregnancy journeys, explore publicly available resources, and work together to produce a prototype of an information resource tailored to their community needs. Results: The qualitative findings from the workshops uncovered their experiences of miscarriage, their health seeking behavior, the role of religious belief and digital media, and the importance to them of their reproductive rights. The messages that they had for a newly arrived Arabic speaking woman were incorporated in a letter illustrated with their drawings, addressed to a fictional character "Dila" and containing QR codes to internet sites for pregnancy support. The letter was digitally animated and recorded in English and Arabic by volunteers among the research participants. The ERicar2 online resource is available for use by UK health providers and Arabic-speaking communities. Discussion: Engagement with migrant mothers through participatory co-creative workshops (ERicar) is a model that can be replicated. In a safe community space, women sharing their pregnancy journeys have led to mutual support and research insights for maternal healthcare. Employing bricolage and iterative co-creation methods, women have been able to contribute to an antenatal resource tailored to the needs of an expectant mother recently resettled in the UK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.