ArticleACS omega2026
Mechanics of Epoxy Nanocomposites: A Study on the Synergy of the Reinforcements.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this study, manufacturing and mechanical characterization are performed on halloysite nanotube (HNT)-reinforced epoxy composite, carboxyl-terminated butadiene-acrylonitrile (CTBN) rubber-added epoxy composite, and both HNT- and CTBN-rubber-added epoxy composites. It is aimed to explore the effects of HNT and CTBN rubber inclusions individually and the synergistic effects of HNT and CTBN rubber inclusions on the epoxy-based composite material. To achieve this, the mechanical characterization of the epoxy matrix composite is performed numerically and experimentally. To investigate the viscoelastic behavior, the samples are subjected to tensile and three-point bending tests at different strain rates (%1, %5, and %10 strain per minute) and to Charpy impact tests. The internal structures of the samples are observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). Results demonstrate that 1% HNT reinforcement increases the elastic modulus by 15% (from 599 to 688 MPa in tensile tests), while 10% CTBN rubber reduces stiffness by 38% but increases elongation at break by 48%. Hybrid composites (H10R05) achieve balanced properties with 16% higher stiffness than pure rubber systems while maintaining 44% higher ductility than pure epoxy. Charpy impact tests show that 10% rubber increases fracture energy by approximately 85% compared to pure epoxy, while HNT provides modest improvements. All samples exhibit strain-rate-dependent behavior, with elastic modulus increasing 10-16% from quasi-static to dynamic loading rates. Numerical modeling using the Mori-Tanaka, Halpin-Tsai, and finite element homogenization (FEH) methods successfully predicts experimental trends, with FEH showing the highest accuracy (deviations <5%). This study provides valuable insights into designing composite materials with balanced mechanical properties through multireinforcement strategies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.