ArticleACS omega2026
Evaluation of USP 3 Apparatus to Develop Biopredictive Fasted and Fed Dissolution Methods for Extended-Release Desvenlafaxine Succinate Tablets.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The development of distinct biopredictive methods for fasted and fed states using a physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) approach is essential for accurately evaluating drug release from solid oral dosage forms, especially extended-release products. However, a fed state biopredictive method for desvenlafaxine tablets is not currently available. Hence, the study aimed to investigate the application of the USP 3 apparatus to develop biopredictive methods for desvenlafaxine tablets. Initially, an existing fasted state biopredictive USP 2 dissolution method was adapted to increase dissolution hydrodynamics by scaling the rotation speed to 75 and 100 rotations per minute (rpm). Subsequently, two dissolution methods were developed using the USP 3 apparatus to emulate fasted and fed conditions. The fed biopredictability of the methods was assessed using a previously developed GastroPlus model to simulate fed conditions under 800 kcal and 50% fat meal. Statistical analysis of dissolution profiles obtained in the paddle apparatus revealed no significant difference from the original 50 rpm method and lacked biopredictive for the fed state, indicating the unfeasibility of developing such a method in this apparatus. In contrast, USP 3 proved to be an important tool to develop a fed state method, since it was biopredictable based on simulation analysis. Additionally, no significant differences were observed between USP 3 methods employing pH-gradient media and those using 0.9% NaCl as the sole medium. These findings highlight a hydrodynamic-driven approach for applying USP 3 to develop distinct biopredictive dissolution methods for fasted and fed states, particularly for high-solubility drugs formulated in robust hypromellose matrices.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.