ArticleACS omega2026
Porous Structuring of Si Microparticles for Li-Ion Battery Anodes by Urea-Assisted Etching.
Article in ACS omega, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Silicon-based anodes offer substantially higher theoretical capacities than graphite in lithium-ion batteries, but their practical deployment is hindered by severe volume changes that induce mechanical degradation and unstable interfacial chemistry. While nanoscaling strategies can mitigate these effects, they often suffer from low tapped density, complex synthesis, and limited scalability. Porous silicon microparticles provide a promising alternative by partially accommodating volume expansion while preserving processability and electrode-level integrity. Here, a HF-free urea-assisted etching strategy is employed to generate porous silicon microparticles under mild conditions, leveraging the coupled action of thermally induced structural disruption and chemically driven surface modification. Control experiments confirm that the combined action of these effects is essential to achieve BJH-resolved mesoporosity and increased surface area. The resulting porous silicon exhibits oxygen- and nitrogen-containing surface functionalities. Composite electrodes prepared with nanographite and sodium alginate binder at graphite:silicon:binder ratios of 8:1:1, 7:2:1, and 4.5:4.5:1 demonstrate improved electrochemical behavior. In half-cell testing, electrodes containing 10-20 wt % porous silicon deliver stable redox activity and retain 630-880 mAh g
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.