Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41799041›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2026

Improvements to dark experience replay and reservoir sampling for better balance between consolidation and plasticity.

Taisuke Kobayashi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Taisuke KobayashiNational Institute of Informatics (NII), The Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI), Tokyo, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Continual learning is one of the most essential abilities for autonomous agents, which can incrementally learn daily-life skills even with limited computer resources. To achieve this goal, a simple yet powerful method called dark experience replay (DER) was recently proposed. DER mitigates catastrophic forgetting, where the skills acquired in the past are unintentionally forgotten when learning new skills, by stochastically storing streaming data in a reservoir sampling (RS) buffer and relearning them or retaining their past outputs. However, because DER considers multiple objectives, it does not function properly without appropriate weighting for each problem. In addition, the ability to retain past outputs inhibits learning if past outputs are inconsistent owing to distribution shifts or other effects. This is because of the trade-off between memory consolidation and plasticity. The trade-off is hidden even in the RS buffer, which gradually stops storing new data for new skills as data are continuously passed to it. To alleviate this trade-off and achieve a better balance, this study proposes improvement strategies for each DER and RS. Specifically, DER is improved by the automatic adaptation of weights, blocking of replaying inconsistent data, and correction of past outputs. RS is also improved with the generalization of acceptance probability, stratification of multiple buffers, and intentional omission of inconsistent data. These improvements were verified using multiple benchmarks including regression, classification, and reinforcement learning problems. Consequently, the proposed methods achieved a steady improvement in learning performance by balancing memory consolidation and plasticity.

Indexed as

consolidation and plasticitycontinual learningdark experience replayreinforcement learningreservoir sampling

Identifiers

PMID41799041
PMCPMC12961966

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.