Trial reportTransplantation direct2026
Evaluation of IVIG for Prevention of Infections Occurring On-study and Treatment of Infection of Solid Organ Recipients With Secondary Antibody Deficiency: A Phase 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in Transplantation direct, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immunomodulatory Strategies for Managing Viral Infections in Solid Organ Transplantation: Progress and Challenges.Current microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
33 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a paucity of data to guide the management of posttransplant secondary antibody deficiency (SAD). We aimed to evaluate the role of IVIG in solid organ recipients with SAD. Methods: A phase 2, randomized, multicenter, open-label study of solid organ recipients with severe infection and SAD defined as serum IgG <600 mg/dL. The study evaluated the efficacy of adding a fixed protocol of IVIG early after detection of SAD to standard of care (SOC) for the prevention of infection occurring on-study and the treatment of infections, versus SOC. We also assessed reconstitution of humoral immunity in a substudy. Forty-four transplant recipients were randomized in 6 transplant centers in Spain. The IVIG protocol comprised 2 doses of 15 g (interval 7-15 d) followed by 3 doses of 20 g (interval 15-30 d). The primary endpoint was infection occurring on-study defined as a new severe infection after randomization. Results: Forty-two patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (IVIG arm, n = 21 versus non-IVIG arm, n = 21). The rate of infection occurring on-study was lower in patients randomized to receive IVIG versus SOC (23.8% versus 66.7%, Fisher exact test, Conclusions: In solid organ recipients with severe infection and SAD, IVIG may reduce infection occurring on-study occurrence versus SOC.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.