ReviewFrontiers in neurology
Advances in intravenous thrombolysis with tenecteplase in the ultra-time window.
Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Worldwide, stroke has become a significant public health concern, with ischemic strokes accounting for over 70% among all stroke types. Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), as a traditional treatment method, is limited by a narrow 4.5-h time window, which restricts its application. The conception of a "tissue window" for imaging evaluation has prompted a change in treatment strategy in recent years, and the time window has been gradually expanded to 24 h. Tenecteplase (TNK), a third-generation thrombolytic medication with a long half-life, good fibrin specificity, and minimal risk of bleeding, has garnered significant research interest in ultra-time window thrombolysis. TNK is noninferior to alteplase (rt-PA) at 4.5 h and has a superior reperfusion rate in patients with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation, according to several phase III randomized controlled studies (e.g., AcT, TRACE-2, ORIGINAL). Ultra-time window studies (e.g., TRACE-3 and TIMELESS) have demonstrated that TNK has a positive safety profile and substantially enhances functional outcomes in patients who possess an ischemic penumbra detected by imaging screening for 4.5-24 h. Nevertheless, certain research (such as the CHABLIS-T II study) demonstrated that the application of ultra-time window intravenous thrombolysis improves reperfusion but doesn't improve the prognosis. Therefore, multicenter trials, coupled with neuroprotective medications or anti-inflammatory therapy, and dynamic imaging stratification are required to optimize intravenous thrombolysis strategies. This article serves as a reference for clinical practice and research direction by conducting a systematic review of the recent findings on ultra-time window thrombolysis in TNK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.