ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Perceived importance of walking among hospitalized patients with stroke: a thematic analysis.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Improved walking ability is a common rehabilitation goal for individuals following a stroke. However, the reasons why hospitalized individuals with stroke consider walking to be important are not yet fully understood. This study aimed to elucidate the perceived importance of walking among hospitalized patients with stroke. Methods: This qualitative study employed thematic analysis. Hospitalized individuals with stroke undergoing gait rehabilitation were purposively sampled to capture variation in sex, age, and walking ability. The participants underwent in-person semi-structured interviews regarding the importance of walking, which were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and systematically coded to generate themes. Results: A total of 19 patients participated in the study. Thematic analysis revealed six major themes. (1) Resumption of daily life: walking was perceived as essential for returning to pre-stroke activities and routines. (2) Health promotion and prevention of functional decline: participants viewed walking as important for maintaining health and preventing deterioration. (3) Uncomfortable walking: participants described physical and environmental challenges associated with walking. (4) Relationships with others: concerns were expressed about how walking difficulties might affect relationships with family and others. (5) Labeling of decreased walking ability: participants were conscious of how their walking was perceived by others. (6) Social environment: walking was linked to broader social factors such as work and transportation. Conclusion: The importance of walking for hospitalized patients with stroke ranges from impersonal and generalizable reasons to highly individualized and diverse factors, with implications for individualized walking rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.