Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798807›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology

An Australian brain bank and the future of alcohol and major neuropsychiatric disorders research.

Julia Stevens, Caine C Smith, Dhiraj Maskey, Mario Novelli, Jennifer Bronfenbrener, Markus J Hofer, Greg T Sutherland

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Julia StevensNew South Wales Brain Tissue Research Centre, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Caine C SmithNew South Wales Brain Tissue Research Centre, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Dhiraj MaskeyNew South Wales Brain Tissue Research Centre, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Mario NovelliNew South Wales Brain Tissue Research Centre, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Jennifer BronfenbrenerNew South Wales Brain Tissue Research Centre, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Markus J HoferSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences and Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Greg T SutherlandNew South Wales Brain Tissue Research Centre, Charles Perkins Centre and School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Brain Tissue Resource Centre for Alcohol ResearchR28AA012725 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY · PI Greg Trevor Sutherland · 2012 to 2026
$7.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS R28 AA012725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Post-mortem human brain banks are a key resource for researching brain diseases. The New South Wales Brain Tissue Resource Centre (BTRC) is a brain bank that uniquely focuses on the recruitment, preparation, and dissemination of tissue from patients with alcohol use disorder and controls. Our controls are prospectively followed through their lifetime via a self-reported questionnaire and yearly updates, and these standardised data allow future matching to disease cases based on individual study needs. Brain banks are expensive to run, and their sustainability is an ever-present topic of concern worldwide. In this review, we explore how the BTRC is adapting to a changing research environment by updates to our banking pipeline, before considering different models whereby brain banks can add greater value to research of the brain and other organs. First, brain tissue research is undergoing a major transformation with the rapid uptake of single-cell and spatial platforms. Brain banks must ensure that their protocols are optimised and updated to match the requirements of these new platforms. The BTRC has moved to rapid fixation of tissue and is trialling freezing protocols that minimise cytoarchitectural damage. Second, post-mortem brain banks are inherently retrospective and cannot ordinarily contribute to research during a donor's lifetime. However, brain banks can also expand their portfolio to include clinical samples and derivatives such as cell lines, and this may promote greater donor interest in subsequent brain donation. Third, brain banks have traditionally run as stand-alone operations given their unique reliance on invasive autopsies and whole organ banking. However, with the increased interest in brain-body interactions, multi-organ tissue banks holding both clinical and post-mortem samples could enable the discovery of general disease mechanisms. Finally, the single-cell and spatial platforms are producing data at a phenomenal rate. Rather than seeing data derived from tissue disseminated to disparate repositories, banks could curate the data in-house and enable dry-lab research alongside their traditional focus on tissue studies. Overall, post-mortem brain banking is an important part of the brain research environment, but the banking pipeline must be designed to maximise benefits for donors and future generations.

Indexed as

alcohol use disorderbiobankingneuropathologyneurosciencepost-mortem brain

Identifiers

PMID41798807
PMCPMC12962939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.