Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798777›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2026

Factors Affecting the Clarity of Nondominant Handwriting Versus Dominant Handwriting.

Andrew Trotman, Matt Tyler, Hayden McAlister, Chris Button, Lech Szymanski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew TrotmanSchool of Computing University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1253-7123
Matt TylerSchool of Computing University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.
Hayden McAlisterSchool of Computing University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.
Chris ButtonSchool of Physical Education Sport and Exercise Sciences University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.
Lech SzymanskiSchool of Computing University of Otago Dunedin New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are interested in shifting writing from the dominant hand to the nondominant hand in adults that suffer from repetitive strain injuries (RSI) or stroke. Anecdotally, some adults can already write on a whiteboard using their nondominant hand. In this investigation, we examine three factors that differ between dominant writing on paper and nondominant writing on a whiteboard: orientation of the writing surface (horizontal or vertical), grip size (pen size or marker size), and handedness (dominant or nondominant). We asked 180 members of the public to write the same short phrase in all eight configurations and to rank their writing from clearest to least clear. We then manually assessed the 1440 samples for clarity. Our analysis shows that the significant factors affecting clarity are the hand used for writing and the orientation of the surface, while grip size does not affect clarity. We also find that although writing clearly with the nondominant hand on a vertical surface with a marker is not a universal trait, 14 of our 24 (58%) left-handed writers possess this skill, but no right-handed writers do.

Indexed as

adaptationhandednesshandwritingorientationpen‐grip

Identifiers

PMID41798777
PMCPMC12965008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.