Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41798769›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of New Zealand2026

Tikanga and Ethical Considerations for Visual Research with Rangatahi Māori.

Larissa Renfrew, Logan Hamley, Jade Le Grice, Maui Hudson, Natalie Kusabs, Daniel Wilson, Terryann Clark

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Larissa RenfrewTe Pūtahi o Pūtaiao Faculty of Science University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8646-8637
Logan HamleyWhakauae Research Services Whanganui New Zealand.
Jade Le GriceTe Pūtahi o Pūtaiao Faculty of Science University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Auckland New Zealand.
Maui HudsonTe Mata Punenga o Te Kotahi, Te Kotahi Research Institute, Faculty of Māori and Indigenous Studies University of Waikato Hamilton New Zealand.
Natalie KusabsWhakauae Research Services Whanganui New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9417-1251
Daniel WilsonTe Pūtahi o Pūtaiao Faculty of Science University of Auckland, Waipapa Taumata Rau Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3593-6234
Terryann ClarkFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5499-5080

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual research is a powerful tool to communicate lived experiences of marginalised communities (Hodgetts et al. 2022). However, there is still much ethical consideration to navigate in the space for researchers working with Māori engaging in visual research, particularly as it relates to Māori data sovereignty (MDS). Institutional ethics are not set up in ways that take account of tikanga in relation to visual research with Māori. Using

Indexed as

ethical considerationsethicsMāori data sovereigntyrangatahi Māorivisual research

Identifiers

PMID41798769
PMCPMC12965020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.