ArticleSage open pediatrics
Mini-Midline Catheters Versus Peripheral Intravenous Catheters in Children With Digestive System Diseases: A Prospective Analysis.
Article in Sage open pediatrics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To compare the mini-midline catheters (Mini-MCs) and peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) in hospitalized children with digestive system diseases. Methods: In this study, children received either an 8-cm Mini-MC or a 24-gauge PIVC based on patient or guardian preference. Catheter outcomes, including dwell time, complications, and unplanned removal, were monitored during the indwelling period. Results: Sixty-four children received Mini-MCs and 61 received PIVCs. Median dwell time was significantly longer in the Mini-MC group (94 hours; Conclusion: Mini-MCs were associated with longer dwell time, fewer complications, and reduced unplanned removal compared with PIVCs, and may be a suitable option for short-term intravenous therapy in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.