ArticleCureus2026
Nurse-Performed Ultrasound-Guided Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) Placement During General Anesthesia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCentral venous access is essential in perioperative management of major abdominal surgery. While centrally inserted central venous catheters (CVCs) are widely used, insertion-related mechanical complications remain a concern. Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) may represent an alternative strategy, particularly when integrated into nurse-led task-sharing workflows. This study evaluated the feasibility and procedural outcomes of ultrasound-guided PICC placement during general anesthesia.
methodsThis single-center retrospective observational study included 86 adult patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery under general anesthesia who required central venous access between January 2023 and December 2025. Patients were divided into a PICC group (n = 41) and a CVC group (n = 45). The primary outcome was catheter placement time (minutes). Secondary outcomes included catheter dwell time (days), catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI), and catheter occlusion with intraluminal thrombus. CRBSI was assessed in accordance with CDC guidance, and patients were followed until catheter removal.
resultsBaseline characteristics were comparable between groups. Catheter placement time was significantly shorter in the PICC group than in the CVC group (5.5 ± 3.1 vs. 7.0 ± 2.3 minutes, p = 0.013). Catheter dwell time was longer in the PICC group (7.1 ± 3.1 vs. 3.3 ± 1.7 days, p < 0.001). CRBSI incidence did not significantly differ between groups (2.4% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.363). Catheter occlusion with intraluminal thrombus occurred in one patient (2.4%) in the PICC group and in none in the CVC group. All catheter placements were successful (100% in both groups).
conclusionsUltrasound-guided PICC placement during general anesthesia was associated with shorter catheter placement time and longer catheter duration than CVC placement in this retrospective cohort. Catheter-related complications were infrequent; however, definitive conclusions regarding comparative safety are limited by the observational design and low event counts. These findings support the feasibility of perioperative PICC use and suggest potential workflow implications within structured nurse-led task-sharing models. Further prospective multicenter studies incorporating direct operating room workflow metrics and catheter-day-based outcomes are warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.